新闻资讯
你的位置: 固原市利洲蚕茧有限公司 > 新闻资讯 >
s it possible for India to follow the Chinese model of growth and development?
印度有可能效仿中国的增长和发展模式吗?
以下是Quora网友的评述:
Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam
Absolutely
India doesn't need to become a One Party Nation or a Nation for that
诚然了
印度并不需要变成一党国度
All India needs is
Drastic Legislation
Massive Base Education Program at Government Cost
Meritocracy and more Meritocracy
Failure Standards and Continuous evaluation in every arena
印度所需要的即是:
制订严厉的法律
政府为大范围的基础锤真金不怕火方法提供资金
精英政事以及更多的精英政事
为每个鸿沟制订评估模范,并进行捏续评估
That's how China became what it is
So it couldn't have been Autocracy alone that steered Chinas massive growth. It should have been the above qualities
这即是中国得以赢得凯旋的神志
因此,乾纲独断毫不是中国经济高速增长的主要原因。中国的发展主淌若以上几点的功劳。
Education and Meritocracy are Chinas biggest strength
Social Justice, Reservations and Cheap Politics are Indias biggest weaknesses
In China,being poor gets you nothing except a free schooling and a lunchtime meal and community tutions
In China, the richer and poorer students go to similar Public Schools with the same Syllabus
So you can't make excuses of poverty
China says “Too bad. If you don't have the merit , please go work at a farm”
锤真金不怕火和精英科罚是中国最大的上风。
资源县新科香精有限公司社会正义、预留制和无耻的政事场面齐是印度最大的缺欠。
在中国,穷东说念主除了能赢得免费锤真金不怕火、免费午餐和社区诱骗外什么齐得不到
在中国,富东说念主家和穷东说念主家的孩子上的齐是差未几的公立学校,教育大纲也相似
是以你不行以空泛为借口
中国说“真晦气。如果你莫得其他才气,那就去农场责任吧。”
Another biggest strength of the Chinese System is ACCOUNTABILITY and FAILURE STANDARDS
同心县锐森白炽灯有限公司Any Problem and China will zero in on the culprit in minutes or days
Every Department has its own role to play
Every Ministry has its own Failure Standards and Performance standards and Promotions are based on these standards
中国体制的另一个最大上风是问责制和失败模范。
无论是什么问题,中国齐不错在几分钟或几天内锁定罪魁罪魁。
每个部门齐有我方的脚色职责
每个部门齐有我方的及格模范和绩效模范,并根据这些模范进行擢升。
Take Chinas 4.5% Growth for Q1 against the Target 3.9%.
Many Officials got rewarded, promoted
Had this been 3.2% Growth, then many officials wouldnt have got promoted for a long time
Every blunder in China has to be paid with
以中国第一季度4.5%的增长为例,当初的方针是3.9%。
许多官员得到了奖励和擢升
如果增长率只须3.2%,那么好多官员在很长一段时期内齐无法得到擢升
在中国,东说念主们要为我方犯下的每一个失实付出代价
India is the opposite
Zero Accountability, Zero failure Standards, Zero Goals for the Government and Excuses all the time
而印度无意相悖
莫得包袱,莫得失败模范,政府也莫得方针,随处随时找借口
So definitely yes
India must follow the Chinese basics and they can do so even without having to be a or an Autocracy
And of course China slogged hard for 45 years
India wants to sit down and expect magic ro happen. That attitude must also change
是以诚然不错
仅仅印度必须撤职效仿中国的基本原则,他们不错作念到,不需要专制也不错
诚然了,中国仍是贫窭激越了45年
印度只思坐等古迹发生的这种气派也必须转换
JWG
India has a different political system and a different culture. These differences are not transplantable. Starting from 1990 China and India had the same GDP. The graph below shows there were sufficient opportunities for India to make adjustments. There is no evidence moving forward that India wants to change. The data trend suggest the divergence can widen.
印度有着和中国不同的政事轨制和文化。这些互异无法转换。1990年的时候,中国和印度的GDP如故相似的。下图泄露,印度也曾有充足的契机作念出治愈,但莫得字据标明印度思过要转换。数据趋势标明,两国的互异可能会不竭扩大。
Amit Jodha
There is not need to.
Indian society is way more chaotic, free and distinct from China, so it’s a fool’s errand to follow their modal, or anyone else’s for that matter.
Every country has some unique situations, it has to make best out of the given situations, it’s necessary to take note of how every country has grown, but to copy it entirely is stupid and will be unsuccessful.
莫得必要。
印度社会更芜乱,更解脱,与中国天壤之隔,是以效仿中国的模式是愚蠢的步履。
每个国度齐有各自的专有之处,必须充分尊重我方的情况,咱们如实要关注每个国度是如何发展的,但统统这个词复制其他国度是愚蠢的步履, 图片处理不会凯旋。
Let’s take a simple example, 纺织原料 as it known, 林业设备 China is a manufacturing powerhouse,毛皮服装 but the service industry is not nearly as strong as India’s. So, 液压部件 following the Chinese modal will essentially mean that we need to shut TCS and other service based countries down, while we need to bolster Manufacturing by imparting basic training to the untapped labor market potential of India.
But as you might have already deduced, that is a horrific idea, what about millions upon millions of Indian professionals in service sector, including me?
举个粗浅的例子,尽人皆知,中国事制造业大国,但服务业远不如印度。因此,如果印度撤职中国模式,本色上意味着咱们需要关闭塔塔商议服务公司和其他服务业,同期还要为印度尚未得到开垦的劳能源市集提供基础培训来赈济制造业。
但正如你可能仍是臆测的那样,这是一个可怕的思法,包括我在内的数百万印度服务行业的专科东说念主士又该如何办?
So, what we instead need to do is become the service powerhouse of the world, but at the same time work on the basics of manufacturing industry so that we can at least compete to some extent with China, or even if not compete,羽毛 we can at least be self sufficient for most of our needs.
We should look forward to have out cities connected with high speed rail like China, so infrastructure should be a priority, but not the ghost towns of China. Indian government has set all cylinders ablaze to boost infrastructure in India, but at the same time, our heritage need to be respected.
因此,咱们印度需要作念的是成为宇宙服务强国,但同期贫窭打造制造业的基础,这样咱们至少不错在一定进度上与中国伸开竞争,或者就算无法和中国竞争,但咱们至少还不错已毕自力餬口,清高印度国内的大部分需求。
咱们应该期待印度的城市和中国相似,通过高铁荟萃相互流畅,是以基础法度建筑应该是优先发展事项,而咱们不要效仿中国建筑鬼城的作念法。印度政府仍是任重道远鼓舞印度的基础法度建筑,但与此同期,咱们也要尊重我方的传统。
India and China have historically been the two largest and richest civilizations, but that was never because they were trying to copy each other, but because they found the potential and power inside themselves to make best use of personalities of the people residing in those nations.
We need to get better than yesterday, and not care much about the growth and ways of China unless we can take lessons in particular topics, such as cleanliness, order and hard work.
印度和中国在历史上是两个最大、最富饶的雅致,但从来齐不是因为他们之间相互效仿,而是因为他们发现了我方内在的后劲和力量,最大阻挡地挖掘了居住在这些国度的大师的才气。
咱们要比历史发展得更好,咱们无用太过矜恤中国的增长和发展神志,除非咱们不错模仿他们在某些问题上的教学,比如环境洁净、社会递次和辛苦贫窭。
Venkata Krishna
My answer is a straight No. India with its myriad of castes and subcastes and outcastes and gargantuan regional differences can never follow the China model.
我的谜底是抵赖的。印度有多数的种姓、次种姓和贱民,并存在高大的地区互异,长久不可能效仿中国模式。
India's foundation prime minster was Pandit Nehru. He believed in gradualism, adoption of scientific method. The only way he could pull up the disadvantaged castes was through reservation. In spite of the best intentions of Nehru North India still suffers from extreme casteism. Therefore reservation for lower castes has to continue.
印度的建国总理是潘迪特·尼赫鲁。他信奉渐进目的,遴荐科学的设施。他惟一能拉拢过失种姓的意见即是履行预留制。尽管尼赫鲁的本意是好的,但印度北部仍未开脱极点的种姓轨制。因此,对低种姓的预留轨制还必须不竭保管下去。
Subramaniam Duraisamy
Yes, its perfectly possible for India to follow Chinese model for our growth and development. The catch is it has a big cost.
What is that big cost you may ask? Its the loss of 15 million human lives.
是的,印度统统这个词有可能效仿中国的增长和发展模式。问题在于这样作念的代价很大。
你可能会问,代价很大是什么意旨道理?意旨道理即是夺走了1500万东说念主的人命。
This is figures complied from Wikipedia but sourced from China’s own national statistics portal. So you cannot accuse me of using biased western sources.
这些数据来自维基百科,但源于中国我方的国度统计流派网站。是以你不要责难我使用的是不公正的西方数据开始。
In the 1960’s India was also a poor hungry country, and experienced two minor famines between 1964 and 1966. However we did not kill off our hungry poor and instead produced more food for the poor through scientific means. Ofcourse- KB Sir would call this “rabble appeasement”, but more rational people would call it human empathy.
20世纪60年代,印度亦然一个空泛的饥饿国度,在1964年至1966年时间印度资格了两次小范围的饥馑。但印度并莫得杀掉饥饿的穷东说念主,而是通过科学本领为穷东说念主坐褥了更多的食品。诚然- KB Sir会把这种步履称为“乌合之众的绥靖”,但感性的东说念主会将其称为东说念主类的同理心。
Much of China’s demographic advantages comes from the fact that the government had draconian one child policies of the 80s. Call it luck or fate, this dividend combined with Deng’s opening of markets in the 80’s helped China.
中国的东说念主口上风主要来自于政府在80年代驱动履行了严厉的独生子女计谋。无论是走时如故运说念,这一红利加上在80年代通达市集,对中国起到了匡助作用。
India on the other hand need not do any of the above. Our birth rates have been declining much more organically and steadily. We have now overtaken China as the most populous country and would continue to have a good growth till 2060 atleast.
但印度不需要这样作念。咱们的建树率一直在稳步下落。咱们当今仍是向上中国,成为全球东说念主口第一大国了,至少在2060年之前,咱们的东说念主口齐将不竭保捏细密的增长。
All this achieved without any major bloodshed or draconian reforms.
This combined with other factors would eventually help our growth organic manner. We need to bring in land, labor and retail reforms along with building our physical and social infrastructure, and its a matter of time
这一切齐是在莫得发生任何环节流血事件或履行严厉纠正的情况下已毕的。
再磋议其他要素,不错有助于咱们保捏有机的增长。咱们需要引入地盘、劳能源和零卖纠正,同期建筑咱们的物资基础和社会基础结构,这即是一个时期问题。
Alfred W Croucher
Is it wise for India to copy China's SEZ led growth model?
印度复制中国经济特区主导的增长模式是奢睿之举吗?
India must do what is best for India. I do not envy Modiji. Creating a modern economy in India just threatens the livelihood of so many people. Perhaps creating some model 'special zones' might have a salutary effect. Of course just throwing the country open to foreign trade and FDI before achieving some degree of modern efficiency would throw millions out of work and create chaos. But the Indian tendency to employ the most labour intensive methods will be difficult to overcome unless so many modern jobs can be created to absorb them.
印度必须作念对我方最成心的事情。我不弘扬莫迪。在印度打造当代经济,只会胁迫到许多印度东说念主的生活。也许创建一些模范“特区”倒是能得到有益的成果。
诚然,在已毕一定进度的当代遵循之前,让印度通达对外交易和异邦径直投资,只会导致数百万东说念主休闲,并形成社会芜乱。
然而,印度东说念主遴荐处事密集型设施的民风很难克服羽毛,除非咱们好像创造出充足多的当代责任岗亭来给与这些劳能源。